|
| bagi6. 07. 2022 10:19:41 |
We saved the most beautiful and at the same time the longest tour for the last day of this visit to Garda and surroundings. Years ago from the top of Monte Cadria we observed the beautiful ridge that mushroom-like spreads around the Val dei Concei valley. It is approximately 15 km long, runs at around 2000 m altitude and due to its shape is ideal for a circular path. There was not much data on the state of the ridge path, even less on current conditions. But the desire was too great and in the end exclamation marks overcame question marks . Fully equipped we set off very early on the path. We parked in the Val dei Concei valley and ascended via 402 to the Rif. Nino Pernici hut. There we wanted to get current information on the entire path, but the keepers unfortunately did not have it yet due to the start of the season. They also doubted our plans a little, especially if we could really manage it in one day. Well, they don't know Slovenes . The excellent morning coffee drove away the last doubts and we decided to continue within safe limits. We can still turn back or descend at a suitable place. And we went ... The entire ridge path originates from the times of the first war and besides official markers is also marked with a yellow eagle. The path consists of two parts. Approximately halfway is the Bocca dell'Ussol saddle and up to there it has mark 420, from there on to Monte Cadria 455. This part also has the name Peace Path ( Sentiero della Pace ). First part - ridge path 420 This is an exceptionally beautiful path and one of the most enjoyable panoramic ones we have hiked. It strongly reminded both of us of the beautiful Carnic 403 ( Klik ). It runs along the front line of the First World War, on mulatieras, paths and trenches that the Austrians built for defensive purposes. The length of the path is considerable, elevation gain also accumulates. On some sections exposure is large, but with caution you get far . Second part - ridge path 455 This is certainly among the most picturesque and interesting paths in these areas, but also by far the most demanding. Altogether it is more of a trail with numerous exposed sections in grass and rocks. There is no end or beginning to the elevation gain, the heat and already walked kilometers also did their part. Here we switched caution to the highest level. Firm step and sober head were very welcome. The final part with ascent to Monte Cadria is a story of its own. The bold path is carved into the rock in places, elsewhere zigzags across extremely exposed slopes. This final ascent is also the longest of all on the path. Finally we panted to the top, stopped the overheated ponies and for the first time took time for a longer rest. From Monte Cadria we descended via 423 all the way to Cadria pasture and in the evening hours descended to the valley. For conclusion… The described circular variant from the valley is a grand tour that requires fitness and experience. The entire path is exceptionally long, in the second part of the ridge also overgrown and substantially exposed. Altogether we needed over 13 hours and did not stop much. This time frame should only be information on the path's difficulty, not a measure. Everyone is a hiker of their own sort. One more warning… despite the great altitude and ridge walking, heat can be an important factor. That happened to us too, because the wind was on vacation that day. There is no water anywhere, we found a small stream only on descent from Cadria pasture. I recommend the entire described loop especially to mountain connoisseurs accustomed to such challenges. Good luck . Starting point coordinates: 45.9283381N, 10.7345819E Data on the hiked path: 27 km / 2700 m elevation gain
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
| (+20) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Trobec6. 07. 2022 11:17:35 |
Nice. Something similar I had eyed last year... but then I was smoothly outvoted that we'd hiked enough in the Dolomites, to Lake Garda we came to rest 
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| panda6. 07. 2022 13:37:58 |
congratulations to both........I really enjoy reading your trip reports. 
| (+3) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Lenakr6. 07. 2022 15:06:44 |
What a beautiful tour, thanks for the photos! Maybe one day I'll pluck up courage 
| (+4) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| zokipoki6. 07. 2022 19:39:47 |
Really wonderful tour! Congratulations! 
| (+1) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| saram6. 07. 2022 19:59:06 |
Bravo, I devour your posts with my eyes. Good luck further on your paths.
| (+4) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| bagi7. 07. 2022 08:59:06 |
Thanks everyone, I really didn't expect such a response . The beauties of mountains know no borders and that's why we like to look over the fence to the neighbors. If our trip reports brighten someone's day or give an idea for a trip, all the better. Emil and Mateja
| (+7) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| MatejaP7. 07. 2022 10:15:54 |
I join Emil. May the posts at least brighten someone's day. Many of you know how much effort it takes to make it nice to the eye and of course useful for repeating. I decided long ago that I'd rather be at the stove ; not everything is for everyone. This year there are still big plans, let's say we'll succeed and Emil won't be out of work. Safe steps to all and we'll keep reading or meet somewhere in person Mateja
| (+6) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| montura7. 07. 2022 16:16:36 |
Congratulations on the exhaustive Gardaland report in pictures and words. I wish your example would attract other hikers to more posts, a few years ago the forum was livelier,
| (+4) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| pohodnik117. 07. 2022 16:31:20 |
I agree that there were more posts on the forum a few years ago. Many left the forum due to constant criticism and provocations from those still active on the forum, especially in commenting, less posting. Back then there were no blogs or they were rare. I know quite a few former forumers who started writing blogs, but on the forum they just posted a link and were characterized as just advertising their blog. And they stopped. On their blogs they still post, but from here they felt driven away. Shame. I regularly followed responses to blogs and they were very two-faced, some bloggers were praised and still welcome, others, especially younger ones, were like "blowhards"... Shame, but if we're honest, that's how it is. What's the problem with clicking a link and reading and viewing photos, as you would if the post was directly on hribi.net?
| (+6) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr7. 07. 2022 16:41:50 |
In 10 or 12 years they together posted 8 photos.
| (+4) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| pohodnik117. 07. 2022 17:03:51 |
Well, @dprapr, "statistically" your observation is correct, but as far as I'm concerned, my hiking partner actively posted for many years, who is also very rarely present on the forum now, but we never in the same thread for the same tour posted one after the other each one's own photos as I often see happening. As if Mateja and Emil would post each one's own report?! Otherwise, so we don't stray too far, in recent years Emil is definitely one of those who posts the most useful reports, which I read with pleasure.
| (+7) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| dprapr7. 07. 2022 17:43:48 |
I also miss more posts, but just complaining doesn't help. Lately I've talked to some who don't post but do good tours. Why it's like that is hard to say. Anyway, Emil's posts attract, even though I don't believe I'll ever hike there. Via ferratas not at all. Especially interesting are the old settlements, which I look at with pleasure. Interesting how much elevation they manage on these paths. I wish them many more. 
| (+7) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Jusk7. 07. 2022 21:41:48 |
pohodnik11, at least my opinion is that pictures should be posted on this forum, not just links to blogs
| (+7) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| pohodnik117. 07. 2022 23:03:27 |
@dprapr, I also recently talked to some who no longer post on this site. To the question why, I got some answers that surprised me... too few likes, especially you don't know who likes you... if you post on FB and Instagram at least you know who likes...   Just a small note regarding Bagi's elevations... not on one tour were we with my hiking partner careful... he measured 1700, all others who hiked there only 1300, and there were no mentioned extra "detours"... We are just planning to repeat some of their tours and measure elevations... the point is only that someone might get scared of these many elevations, which maybe aren't that many in reality, and not go on a tour they're convinced they can't manage...
|
|
|
|
| bagi8. 07. 2022 09:00:44 |
Some very short explanations so there's no confusion about GPS data differences. Although it's a whole science, the track is mainly influenced by the following factors... Hardware (GPS sensors)... Phones are the worst, handheld watches a bit better, dedicated devices higher quality. This shows mainly in signal detection, consequently how *fuzzy* the track is and how individual points are drawn in areas of poor signal. It happens that the device draws straight lines or makes *bird nests* in such areas. All this affects the final data. Software... Different apps can display GPS tracks very differently. This applies especially to smartphones, where even identical GPS tracks are output differently (checked multiple times). This is due to internal data processing that differs from app to app, all depending on the software developer's knowledge. Terrain where GPS track is recorded... Open spaces allow visibility of all necessary satellites and thus the track is more accurate. Conversely, closed spaces don't and error is larger. Here I help myself with excellent app Mapy.cz, which has very accurate height and length data. Unfortunately doesn't work on pathless terrain. The data I provide always have the same reference. I've been recording GPS tracks for some years with Garmin Montana 610 (previously Montana 600), clean tracks in Garmin BaseCamp, for control and planning use mentioned Mapy.cz. In the end for a tour it's not the elevations on paper that decide, but only the hiker's psychophysical readiness. My example… sometimes at peak season I barely drag myself to Šmarna gora, after a good week I hop up Triglav without any problem. Hike nicely with tracks or without and above all enjoy. Good luck  Emil
| (+12) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| Trobec8. 07. 2022 09:56:01 |
This thing about too few likes is really bizarre to me...but unfortunately that's the world today. As far as I follow, posts on hribi.net are on average much higher quality than those in various hiking FB groups, where many are exclusively meant for pumping ego and collecting likes (then pictures only selfies and tense butts, or the only comment in style "marked 8 hours, I walked only 7, bravo me"). Regarding blogs/own sites...it's a purely practical matter, at least for me. On my site I can write halfway and continue after a couple hours/next day. And when the post is finished I put on hribi.net a short description, few pics and link. Whoever's fine with pics will look at pics, whoever's more precisely interested in conditions doesn't mind that 1 click. It's funny (more on fb than here), when then under the post appears question "what are the conditions?" and "how many hours to walk"...and it's all just 1 click away  Regarding GPS tracks Emil described very well. I'd add just this, lately I always process gpx in gpx.studio. There you quickly see if device lost signal midway and can simply cut excess points. And even if otherwise looks ok, stats (mainly elevation, less distance) quickly shrink by about 10%. Poorer devices (phones, watches) are less accurate and from one measurement to next height can jump few m up and down. Gpx.studio doesn't consider every single point, but at least 3, I think. Then stats more realistic too. Other programs work similarly.
| (+12) |  | |
|
|
|
|
| bagi28. 11. 2025 09:16:57 |
This time the plan was to repeat the most beautiful part of the ridge stretching from the main peak of Monte Cadria around the Val dei Concei valley. This section runs from the Bocca dell'Ussol pass to the Rif. Nino Pernici hut, including some nice peaks with Doss dela Torta as the highest among them. The traverse was time-wise fully manageable given the late date, and my friends hadn't been there yet either. We started at the parking lot that allowed the simplest loop variant, continued along the road or path 414 towards the valley hut Rifugio al Faggio. It was closed, so we went straight on, this time through a picturesque and especially watery gorge. Water was roaring everywhere, luckily we didn't have to wet our feet anywhere . Later we reached the Malga Gui pasture, then followed the final ascent to the Bocca dell'Ussol pass. There we first viewed the nearby war memorial Chiesetta della Pace carved into the live rock, then continued north. The path is mostly ridge-like and exposed in places, but at the same time extremely scenic and enjoyable. First up was Gavardina peak, then the main Doss dela Torta, next slightly lower Monte Tofino and finally Corno di Pichea. Followed descent to Bocca di Trat pass near Nino Pernici hut. That one was unfortunately closed too, so we descended straight to the valley via path 402. It's quite steep and more suitable for ascent than descent. The ridge walk done is also more recommended towards Monte Cadria than away from it, mainly due to sun position. It shone in our faces all the time, and good photos are harder to take. Difficulty same both ways. We reached start after good nine hours, this time already in valley dusk. The route is very scenic, recommend to anyone with appropriate experience . Start coordinates (Val dei Concei): 45.9283336N, 10.7346633E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
| (+4) |  | |
|
|
|
You must log in to post a comment:
If you do not yet have a username, you must first
register.